Blog

13Apr

The Illusion of Choice

Posted by Campbell Williams | 13 Apr 2010

Category: General

Instinctively, we think we want and like choices - the more the merrier. But do we really? Take mobile phones as an example: look at the successes of iPhone and BlackBerry and compare that to the relative struggles of the likes of Nokia and Sony Ericsson.

I used to have a Nokia phone and BlackBerry just for email. The last time I had to choose a Nokia was a nightmare - hundreds of phones from which to choose (or so it seemed), features I couldn't tell the difference between, a bewildering choice. In the end, I just said "I'll have the same one as everybody else".

I'm a BlackBerry kind of guy and a "power" email user. So, like my kin, I think the iPhone is a toy and it takes me 10 times longer to type anything on them. And don't get me started on their infuriating "let me show you my latest app" owners - I'm happy just with BrickBreaker.

(I jest, of course; for the record, I'm a huge Apple fan, I've used Macs since Macintosh Plus in the 80s and I've owned 6 iPods. So please, zealots, don't hunt me down!)

Nobody can deny that the iPhone has been a roaring success, and I can't help but think it's because people say "I want an iPhone" and that's the decision made. It's the same with BlackBerrys - part status symbol and part joy to use - where you've got the choice of the same one as everybody else or the slightly cheaper one or the slightly more expensive one. Easy peasy.

I'm not saying that the technology is easy, it's not. Huge amounts of R&D have been ploughed in by Apple and RIM to make their devices the market leaders they are today. The key for me is that their R&D focuses on crucial elements like the user experience and manageability/security for businesses. Not in spitting out device number 58 in your range because you grew up with Heinz and you love to tinker with variety.

I think there are lessons for everybody in the technology value chain. Manufacturers and suppliers need to make their products easier to understand. Integrators like Charterhouse need to take complicated technologies and turn them into a handful of easy-to-understand solution options. And end-users need to focus on the 2 or 3 business issues that they're trying to resolve. If we can achieve that, collectively, then we can be successful together.

  • 2 Comments

Comments

Campbell Williams 5 May 2010 12:07:19 PM

I completely agree. It's the user experience that's critical, and that now involves a lot more than just hardware. It's what us marketeers call "the total ownership proposition" and that's an object lesson for anybody in the technology industry or any other. Apple were helped massively by their existing iPod user base for early iPhone adoption. I know that if I was in the market for a phone/MP3 player, I'd struggle to look past the iPhone because my whole sonic life is currently sat on iTunes, for example. In B2B land, it's the same story. Access to content, quickly and securely, is what we want and need. That's where RIM were hugely successful in email, and the battle will be fought in the apps space for business in future. Open up your APIs guys, all the apps makers want multi-platform plays, and all the potential customers want as many business apps as they can, integrated to business systems.

Anonymous 5 May 2010 11:40:40 AM

Generally agree with the point Campbell - but surely the real lesson is that the device alone is only part of the story, its the complete proposition of the end user experience that offers real value, so its the iPhone+AppsStore - the integration of hardware and software that offers differentiation? In a crowded market, paper specs are starting to look irrelavant. A surprising element to this is how the tech press have constantly knocked the iPhone from release, but it still sells, because it works, and because people like it. Watch and learn Nokia, Microsoft, HTC....

Leave a Comment

Share this blog post

More...